Proficiency testing (PT) programs
are type of an external quality assessment in which simulated patient specimens
made from a common pool are analyzed by the laboratories enrolled in the
program. The results are then evaluated to determine the quality of each
laboratory’s performance. Government and licensing agencies increasingly use PT
as a method for accrediting laboratories thereby giving them official
authorization to operate. The performance characteristics of PT programs for
detecting bias and imprecision are evaluated using methods similar to those as
assessing internal QC.
A common evaluation criterion is comparison of PT test
results with those of peer groups, considering all values that exceed 2SD to be
unacceptable. To be totally successful a laboratory should produce correct
results on 4 out of 5 specimens for each of the analytes and have an overall
score of at least 80% for 3 consecutive challenges. If a laboratory has 2 or
more incorrect results for any analyte or has an overall score <80% on tow
of 3 consecutive surveys, it is suspended.
For PT the sample are made by
agencies which has target value established by definitive or reference methods.
If definitive method is not available a comparative method may be used. If the
method group is <20 participants, target value means the overall mean after
outliers removal. Or in absence of definitive method, then peer group mean
values or groups of methods that agree with the definitive method can be used.
This target value is termed the definitive method corrected target value
(DMCTV).
I am getting my ISO 17025 accreditation next week. I have been studying, researching, and planning for months and months. I can't wait to finally be considered a professional in this area. I do sound confident, but believe me my nerves are all over the place.
ReplyDelete